I learned how to live by learning how to make films | Ankur Singh Thapa | TEDxIslington College

I learned how to live by learning how to make films | Ankur Singh Thapa | TEDxIslington College

🎙 Ankur Singh Thapa 👥 44.7M 📅 October 21, 2026 ⏱ 11 min 👁 1 📄 expert opinion 🧭 2026-10-21
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

waitingfilmmakingself-discoverypurposepresent moment

Summary

In this TEDx talk, filmmaker Ankur Singh Thapa shares his personal journey of constant moving and career hopping, which led him to a deeper understanding of life through the process of making a feature film. He recounts his early plans to complete a film in four months, which stretched into five months of shooting due to unpredictable delays, teaching him the art of waiting. Thapa reflects on his restless nature, influenced by societal expectations in Nepal to leave the country, and his constant chase for ‘what’s next.’ Through the film’s narrative—about two friends uncertain of their life paths—he realizes he was always trying to know the ending without living through the process. The filmmaking experience taught him that sometimes the next scene isn’t ready, and the real work is to live fully in the current one. By the end, he embraces waiting as a companion rather than an enemy, concluding that life, like a film script, is written as we go.

161 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The talk offers valuable insights into the psychological struggle with impatience and the societal pressure to constantly move forward. The speaker’s argument is built on personal anecdotes that are relatable and authentic, weaving a narrative that connects filmmaking’s inherent waiting with life’s unpredictability. He effectively uses his life story as evidence, and the metaphor of writing a script without knowing the ending is powerful. However, the argumentation is purely anecdotal and lacks external references, which limits its scientific rigor. The strength lies in its emotional resonance and the universal relevance of its message about patience and presence.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The talk is intellectually rigorous in its self-reflective analysis, but it cites no external sources, relying solely on personal experience. The only reference is the generic TEDx link in the description, which doesn’t support the content specifically. The title matches the content well, as the speaker explicitly connects his learning to live with his filmmaking experience. There is no misleading information; the talk is clear about its subjective nature.

181 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content: the speaker explains how the process of filmmaking, particularly the waiting involved, taught him to live in the present.

Quality & Reliability

7/10

The talk is a personal narrative, deeply reflective and coherent, but lacks external validation or data. The speaker's honesty about his journey and the philosophical insight about waiting provide reliable subjective experience, yet no scientific backing.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

  • TEDx Official — General link to TEDx events, provided by the speaker in description.

Contribution & Novelties

The talk’s original contribution is framing filmmaking’s inherently waiting-heavy process as a practical school for cultivating patience and presence, especially for someone with a rush-oriented mindset. It personalizes a universal struggle and offers a metaphor (life as an unwritten script) that encourages embracing uncertainty.

Pour aller plus loin :

  • Patience — Wikipedia article on the virtue of patience, providing historical and philosophical context.
  • Mindfulness — Wikipedia article on mindfulness, which relates to living in the present moment.
  • Heidegger’s Being and Time — Philosophical work on the nature of being and time, relevant to the concept of waiting and existence.
  • The Journey vs. The Destination — A common metaphor about valuing the process over the goal.

115 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows a moderate balance between information quantity and quality, with a low technical score. The talk excels in subjective depth but lacks empirical data, resulting in a moderate overall reliability. The low technicality aligns with its personal narrative nature.

Reliability 6/10