CHOWRA MAKAREMI - Prix européen de l’essai 2026 - Fondation Charles Veillon - Unil - Vidy-Lausanne

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The discussion provides valuable insights into the concept of ‘affective resistance’ as a lens for understanding social movements. Makaremi’s arguments are grounded in her anthropological fieldwork and personal family history, offering a compelling case for the political significance of emotions, care, and attachment. The conversation with Lépinard enriches the discussion by drawing parallels with Western feminist movements, highlighting the universal yet context-specific nature of these dynamics. The argumentation is solid, though it remains at an introductory level, suitable for a general audience rather than specialists.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The discussion is scientifically rigorous, with Makaremi referencing her own published works and academic research, as well as scholars like Nazan Üstündağ. The sources mentioned are credible and relevant. The title accurately represents the content: a prize ceremony and roundtable discussion. The event is well-structured, with clear introductions and a coherent flow. The public nature of the event means that the depth of analysis is accessible, but it does not compromise the scientific quality.

The title accurately reflects the event: the award ceremony and roundtable discussion with Chowra Makaremi, hosted by the University of Lausanne and the Charles Veillon Foundation.

8/10

The discussion features a recognized anthropologist and a gender studies professor, grounded in academic research and personal archives. The content is well-structured and nuanced, though it remains a public debate rather than a peer-reviewed presentation.

Markers derived by PSI from the transcript: the creator did not define chapters.

• 00:00Introduction by Éric Vrin, dramaturge of Théâtre Vidy-Lausanne, welcoming the audience and introducing the event.
• 03:00Speech by Nicolas Salamin, vice-rector of the University of Lausanne, on the importance of the essay prize and the university's commitment to critical thinking.
• 10:00Salomé Kiner introduces Chowra Makaremi and Éléonore Lépinard, setting the stage for the discussion on feminism and social struggles.
• 15:00Makaremi begins her response, discussing her grandmother's influence and the concept of affective resistance.
• 30:00Makaremi elaborates on the role of lullabies and Kurdish mothers' resistance, referencing Nazan Üstündağ's work.
• 45:00Lépinard discusses her podcast on the MLF and the importance of archiving feminist memories.
• 1:00:00The conversation shifts to the broader implications of affective resistance for social movements.
• 1:15:00Discussion on the role of emotions in political mobilization and the intersection of feminism and social justice.
• 1:30:00Q&A session begins with the audience, though the transcription cuts off before the questions are fully captured.

• Résistances affectives – Les politiques de l’attachement face aux politiques de la cruauté — The book by Chowra Makaremi, awarded the European Essay Prize 2026, central to the discussion.
• Femme vie liberté – Échos d’un soulèvement révolutionnaire en Iran — Makaremi's previous book on the Iranian revolution, mentioned as part of her work.
• Les cahiers d’Asis – Au cœur de la révolution iranienne — Makaremi's book based on her grandfather's memoirs, mentioned in the introduction.
• Une histoire iranienne — Makaremi's documentary on her mother's life, mentioned as a related work.
• Féminisme et intersectionnalité — Book by Éléonore Lépinard and Sarah Mazouz, mentioned as part of Lépinard's work.
• La guerrière, la mère, la politicienne — Book by Nazan Üstündağ, referenced by Makaremi in the discussion on Kurdish mothers.

• Résistances affectives – Les politiques de l’attachement face aux politiques de la cruauté — The book itself, which aligns with the discussion's themes.
• Femme vie liberté – Échos d’un soulèvement révolutionnaire en Iran — Makaremi's previous work, consistent with her focus on Iranian social movements.

• No discordant sources identified — The discussion presents a coherent perspective without conflicting sources.