These Simple Websites Make $100,000/Month | Here's How to Build One with AI

These Simple Websites Make $100,000/Month | Here's How to Build One with AI

🎙 Astro K Joseph 👥 85K 📅 June 2, 2026 ⏱ 12 min 👁 5K 📄 tutorial 🧭 2026-09-17
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

online toolsAI codingAdSenseSEOside income

Summary

The video introduces a business model based on creating simple online tools websites (e.g., converters, calculators) that generate revenue primarily through display advertising. The presenter showcases several existing platforms like tinywow.com, miniwebtool.com, and calculatorsoup.com, highlighting that they receive millions of monthly visits. He explains the revenue per mille (RPM) concept and gives a conservative estimate of $7 per 1000 visitors, with potential for higher earnings from US traffic. He then demonstrates building such a website using Horizons, an AI-powered web development tool from Hostinger. The process involves describing the desired platform with a text prompt, and the AI generates a functional website with multiple tools. The presenter adds tools like a SIP calculator, JPG to PNG converter, and HTML minifier to illustrate the ease of expansion. He also discusses deployment, Google Search Console integration, keyword research, and securing ads through networks like AdSense or Mediavine once traffic reaches certain thresholds. The core message is that anyone can build a tools website with minimal coding and monetize it through ads.

169 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The video’s main value lies in its practical, step-by-step demonstration of creating a tools website using AI, making it accessible to non-coders. It also provides a concrete revenue model with estimated RPM figures, giving viewers a realistic idea of potential earnings. However, the argumentation is largely anecdotal; the presenter cites his own experience and general examples without presenting verified data. The claims that ‘simple websites make $100,000/month’ are based on showcases like calculatorsoup.com, which likely do generate significant ad revenue, but the presenter does not provide exact breakdowns or verifiable revenue statements for those sites. The argument would be strengthened by citing specific ad network earnings reports or third-party traffic analyses. Despite this, the guidance on SEO and ad network requirements is reasonable and aligns with common industry practices.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The video uses real websites as examples and suggests using tools like SimilarWeb to verify traffic, which adds credibility. However, it heavily promotes Hostinger’s Horizons, introducing a potential bias. The presenter does not cite external scientific sources, but his advice on SEO and ad networks is consistent with standard knowledge. The title is accurate and not misleading, as the content does show examples of such websites and explains how to build one. The lack of citations and heavy sponsorship reduce the overall rigor.

227 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content: the video shows examples of simple tools websites generating income and demonstrates how to build one using AI.

Quality & Reliability

6/10

The video provides practical, actionable advice with real examples and revenue estimates, but is partly promotional for a sponsored tool. Some claims about earnings are anecdotal and lack rigorous data.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

Contribution & Novelties

The video contributes a practical, low-code method for building and monetizing tools websites using AI, emphasizing client-side processing to minimize hosting costs. It offers a concrete framework from creation to ad revenue, with real-world examples. While not revolutionary, it packages existing concepts into an accessible guide.

Pour aller plus loin :

102 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows moderate scores across all axes, with quantity of information slightly higher than quality and technical level. This indicates a practical tutorial that offers a good amount of actionable content but lacks deep technical and critical rigor, typical of a promotional yet informative video.

Reliability 6/10